---
id: "d296a396-434e-4dce-943c-449a5f9e6791"
kind: "link"
title: "UDRP over Ollith.com fails despite suspiciously fast registration"
language: "en"
section: "legal"
date: "2026-10-07T06:19:41Z"
updated: "2026-10-07T06:19:41Z"
canonical: "https://tldlog.com/l/udrp-over-ollith-com-fails-despite-suspiciously-fast/"
origin: "master"
translations:
  es: "https://tldlog.com/es/l/udrp-ollith-com-fracasa-pese-registro-sospechosamente-rapido/"
source:
  name: "DomainGang"
  url: "https://domaingang.com/domain-law/ollith-com-udrp-domain-grab-survives-premature-trademark-claim/"
  language: "en-US"
  date: "2026-10-06T13:27:07Z"
---

# UDRP over Ollith.com fails despite suspiciously fast registration

## in plain words

A man tried to use a UDRP, a system for settling domain name disputes, to take over the website address Ollith.com. He had only just applied for a trademark on the name OLLITH, and the domain was registered one minute after his application, then put up for sale for almost $2,000. A panel decided he filed too soon, since his trademark wasn't approved yet, so he lost the case but can try again later once he actually owns the trademark.

Glenn Richard Meridth, a California-based entrepreneur planning to sell skincare products under the OLLITH brand, filed a UDRP complaint against the domain Ollith.com, registered through Dominet (HK) Limited to respondent Dyandot-1/Dyandot. Meridth had applied to register the OLLITH trademark with the USPTO on September 4, 2026, and the domain was registered within one minute of that filing, then listed for sale at $1,999.99.

Meridth argued this timing proved the respondent had targeted his emerging trademark rights, pointing to the domain's identical match to OLLITH and the lack of any legitimate business use by the respondent, who never responded to the complaint. He claimed the quick resale listing at an inflated price showed bad faith rather than genuine interest in the name.

Panelist Alan L. Limbury, appointed by Forum on October 1, 2026, acknowledged that the one-minute gap between the trademark filing and domain registration suggested the respondent was aware of the pending application. However, he found this insufficient to grant the complaint, since Meridth filed the UDRP only three days after his trademark application, while it was still pending, and did not submit evidence of any registered or common-law trademark rights at the time.

The panel also noted that OLLITH is a known surname, meaning it could not be treated as inherently distinctive without further proof. Because UDRP complaints generally require an existing trademark right at the time of filing, the panel denied the complaint without prejudice, allowing Meridth to refile once his trademark application matures into a registration or he can otherwise establish rights.

The domain Ollith.com therefore remains with the original respondent for now. The case illustrates how premature UDRP filings, even those involving apparently opportunistic domain registrations, can fail on procedural grounds when trademark rights have not yet been formally established.

Source: [DomainGang](https://domaingang.com/domain-law/ollith-com-udrp-domain-grab-survives-premature-trademark-claim/)